This report monitors the conduct of the 2008 Jammu and Kashmir State Assembly elections in the context of ongoing military occupation. The report highlights the context in which the elections took place. Among its many findings it finds that blatant forms of rigging that were prevalent in previous elections were less prevalent in 2008. It also finds that 45% of respondents felt elections have no impact on resolving the Kashmir conflict, coercion to participate in elections was strong.
Topics: historical backdrop, total number of civilians killed in 2008, attack on media and journalists, local media banned, curfew and hartal in 2008 in Kashmir, extraordinary conditions under which electoral process was called for and carried out, monitoring election by region, data analysis
Terms: Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act (PSA), Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), the Enemy Agent Ordinance (1948), The Egress and Internal Movement (control) Ordinance (1948), Prevention of Unlawful Activities Act (1963), Prevention of Suppression and sabotage Act (1965), rigged elections, coercion, denial of political rights, denial of free assembly, denial of political self-determination
Just two months prior to declaration of state assembly elections, on October 19, 2008, Jammu and Kashmir was in agitation. For over two months, in June to August 2008, masses of people came out in Kashmir to demand 'Azaadi' (freedom) from India. Militants silenced their guns in civilian areas. Simultaneously, in Hindu dominated three districts of Jammu region, namely; Jammu, Kathua and Udhampur, an agitation spearheaded by Hindu right-wing extremists declared a sort of war against Muslims by imposing economic blockade. By August 11, the Indian state proceeded to crack down on Kashmiris demanding freedom, but adopted a kid glove treatment for the Jammu based agitation. Strict curfew, i.e., with shoot-at-sight orders, was imposed, reminiscent of early 1990, protesters fired at resulting in loss of lives.
The Electoral Commission (EC) announced an unusually long seven phase election, spread over six weeks, from November 17 to December 24. Extraordinary measures were adopted. For instance, security forces deployment of 667,000 for counter-insurgency was augmented by 452 companies of central paramilitary forces (cpmf). Since each company comprises approximately 100 persons, nearly 50,000 more troops were deployed inside those constituencies where elections were to be held. The counter-insurgency grid remained intact. But areas where polls were to be held were cut off from rest of Kashmir by imposing, what is euphemistically called, informal curfew.
December 2008
Originally published