Primary texts pertaining to violations of international law in Indian-Administered Jammu and Kashmir.
In 1971, the third India-Pakistan war since Partition (primarily over East Pakistan or, thereafter, Bangladesh) resulted in Pakistani defeat. In June 1972, GoI and GoP entered into the Simla Agreement. Key provisions of the Simla Agreement include:
Topics: peacebuilding, peaceful settlement, UN Charter
Originally published
July 1972
In 1971, the third India-Pakistan war since Partition (primarily over East Pakistan or, thereafter, Bangladesh) resulted in Pakistani defeat. In June 1972, GoI and GoP entered into the Simla Agreement. Key provisions of the Simla Agreement include:
Topics: peacebuilding, peaceful settlement, UN Charter
Originally published
July 1972
This resolution demanded a durable ceasefire and cessation of hostilities until withdrawals of all armed forces to the ceasefire line in Kashmir. It also requested the Secretary-General to keep the Council informed “without delay” on developments related to the implementation of the resolution
Demands a durable cease-fire and cessation of all hostilities in conflict areas be strictly observed and remain in effect until withdrawals take place, as soon as practicable, of all armed forces to positions supervised by UNMOGIP
Calls upon:
Topics: demilitarization, international peace, international intervention, Geneva Conventions, right to life, relief, rehabilitation, right of return
Originally published
December 1971
This resolution demanded a durable ceasefire and cessation of hostilities until withdrawals of all armed forces to the ceasefire line in Kashmir. It also requested the Secretary-General to keep the Council informed “without delay” on developments related to the implementation of the resolution
Demands a durable cease-fire and cessation of all hostilities in conflict areas be strictly observed and remain in effect until withdrawals take place, as soon as practicable, of all armed forces to positions supervised by UNMOGIP
Calls upon:
Topics: demilitarization, international peace, international intervention, Geneva Conventions, right to life, relief, rehabilitation, right of return
Originally published
December 1971
Council meetings were called following deterioration in relations between India and Pakistan over several incidents, including Jammu and Kashmir and in East Pakistan. Additionally, UNMOGIP reported violations on both sides of the Karachi Agreement (1949).
Notes the lack of unanimity among permanent members over two UNSC meetings has prevented UNSC from exercising its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security and decides to refer question to the UN General Assembly
Topics: international peace, international intervention, failure of bilateralism, UMOGIP, Karachi Agreement
Originally published
December 1971
Council meetings were called following deterioration in relations between India and Pakistan over several incidents, including Jammu and Kashmir and in East Pakistan. Additionally, UNMOGIP reported violations on both sides of the Karachi Agreement (1949).
Notes the lack of unanimity among permanent members over two UNSC meetings has prevented UNSC from exercising its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security and decides to refer question to the UN General Assembly
Topics: international peace, international intervention, failure of bilateralism, UMOGIP, Karachi Agreement
Originally published
December 1971
Nominally India’s premier “anti-terrorism” law, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act has been widely used in Indian-Administered Jammu and Kashmir (after August 2019) to suppress any kind of dissent or free expression, “legally” detaining people and denying them due process and access to justice. The UAPA authorizes warrantless searches and detention for six months (without charge or trial or an opportunity at bail) if a person is deemed by the goverment to be capable of committing a crime. In Indian-Administered Jammu and Kashmir, it is often used independently and in combination with the Public Safety Act to arbitrarily detain prisoners of conscscience.
Topics: preventive detention, arbitrary imprisonment, violation of political rights, violation of right to liberty, violation of right to free expression, violation of freedom of belief, violation of due process, violation of right to habeas corpus, violation of right to free and fair trial, prisoners of conscience, suppression of dissent, colonial domination
Originally published
December 1967
Nominally India’s premier “anti-terrorism” law, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act has been widely used in Indian-Administered Jammu and Kashmir (after August 2019) to suppress any kind of dissent or free expression, “legally” detaining people and denying them due process and access to justice. The UAPA authorizes warrantless searches and detention for six months (without charge or trial or an opportunity at bail) if a person is deemed by the goverment to be capable of committing a crime. In Indian-Administered Jammu and Kashmir, it is often used independently and in combination with the Public Safety Act to arbitrarily detain prisoners of conscscience.
Topics: preventive detention, arbitrary imprisonment, violation of political rights, violation of right to liberty, violation of right to free expression, violation of freedom of belief, violation of due process, violation of right to habeas corpus, violation of right to free and fair trial, prisoners of conscience, suppression of dissent, colonial domination
Originally published
December 1967
Reaffirms UNSC Resolution 211, requests GoI and GoP to cooperate toward full implementation of para 1 of UNSC Resolution 211, calls on GoI and GoP to instruct their armed personnel to cooperate with UN and cease all military activity and insists there be an end to cease-fire violations
Demands the prompt and unconditional execution of the proposal previously agreed in principle by GoI and GoP to meet with the UN Secretary-General for the purpose of formulating an agreed plan and schedule for withdrawals by both parties
Topics: international peace, international intervention, failure of bilateralism, demilitarization
Originally published
November 1965
Reaffirms UNSC Resolution 211, requests GoI and GoP to cooperate toward full implementation of para 1 of UNSC Resolution 211, calls on GoI and GoP to instruct their armed personnel to cooperate with UN and cease all military activity and insists there be an end to cease-fire violations
Demands the prompt and unconditional execution of the proposal previously agreed in principle by GoI and GoP to meet with the UN Secretary-General for the purpose of formulating an agreed plan and schedule for withdrawals by both parties
Topics: international peace, international intervention, failure of bilateralism, demilitarization
Originally published
November 1965